ChatGPT has certainly made history as the most popular AI chatbot, but it also has no shortage of competitors. One such competitor is Claude, which offers an impressive chatbot service, but does this option outperform ChatGPT?
Before discussing the pros and cons of ChatGPT and Claude in depth, the article will provide a simple comparison table that you can use to understand the basics.
US and UK
GPT-3.5 and GPT-4
Claude 1.3 and Claude 2
Free of charge
Limit training data
Trained until September 2021
Trained until December 2022
Yes – can be deleted
Yes – can be deleted
As you can see, there are some differences to consider.
In what way is ChatGPT superior to Claude? What perks and advantages does it boast?
ChatGPT offers great features and benefits to users, starting with the ability to make reminders.
As discussed previously, ChatGPT is not only fed data during the training phase. LLM is also trained to process human language, allowing for smoother, more conversational responses. Along with a human-like voice, ChatGPT can respond to a multitude of prompts. You can ask ChatGPT to provide information, check spelling and grammar, create schedules, translate text, etc.
While GPT-3.5 can perform all the functions mentioned above, GPT-4 is even more capable of interpreting user language, accurately executing prompts, and reasoning efficiently . GPT-4 also has a double character limit compared to GPT-3.5.
In addition, ChatGPT has a variety of browser plugins, including:
These plugins have many different functions but generally allow you to integrate ChatGPT into your online activities.
One of the biggest disadvantages of ChatGPT is that its training data is only up to date until September 2021. This means ChatGPT cannot provide any newer information, which limits what you can do. may request.
ChatGPT also suffers from AI illusion, in which the AI system gives incorrect answers that do not correlate with its training data. The system will believe this answer is correct, no matter how far the answer is from reality. AI hallucinations can lead to dishonest reactions and misinformation.
If you want to use ChatGPT, you can do so for free, but will be limited to the capabilities of GPT-3.5. To use GPT-4, you need to upgrade to ChatGPT Plus, which costs /month at the time of writing. If you don’t want to spend any money but want the best version of ChatGPT, you may find this a difficult hurdle to overcome.
Finally, ChatGPT doesn’t support use over VPN, which can make it difficult if you’re a regular VPN user or want to bypass geo-restrictions in your region.
So how does Claude compare to ChatGPT?
There are several ways that Claude outperforms ChatGPT.
First, Claude might be more suitable for people who want to create or refine code using an AI chatbot.
This is especially true for Claude 2 users, as it has a much larger context window than Claude 1.3 (which has a token limit of just 9,000) and ChatGPT. Claude 2 users can enter a staggering 100,000 tokens per prompt, meaning the chatbot can be given more data to work with.
If you have a large block of code that you want LLM to look through, then you will be limited to using ChatGPT (whether GPT-3.5 or GPT-4) compared to Claude 2. With Claude 2 you can provide hundreds of lines code without worrying about reaching the input limit.
Then the increased output limit of the Claude 2 allows for more detailed and informative feedback.
In addition, Claude has been trained with information up to December 2022, almost two years more than ChatGPT. This means that Claude can use more recent data, expanding his ability to answer fact-based questions.
Finally, Claude 2 is completely free to use, requiring no one-time fee or monthly subscription to use.
Claude’s biggest limitation is its geographical availability. At the time of writing, Claude is only available to US and UK residents, while ChatGPT is available in most countries worldwide.
Unlike ChatGPT, Claude does not offer plugins, which limits its flexibility in certain settings. However, Claude can be added to Slack if you want a little help writing messages or summarizing messages you receive.
Like ChatGPT, Claude is also at risk of AI illusion, which is important to keep in mind.
To understand more about how these two LLMs work, give each option the same prompts to see how they react.
First, ask both Claude and ChatGPT to provide a poem, each time using the same prompt.
Both ChatGPT and Claude provide poems that fit the parameters of the prompt.
ChatGPT’s poem is slightly shorter, emphasizing that it follows the required ABAB rhyme scheme.
Claude, on the other hand, provides a slightly longer poem, but the two are equal in terms of creativity.
ChatGPT and Claude were asked to solve the same mathematical equation. Both chatbots received the same trigonometry question, which involved finding the value of an angle.
ChatGPT’s responses take us through the equation step by step instead of just providing answers.
When faced with a similar problem, Claude gave the following answer:
Interestingly, both chatbots gave different results, but only ChatGPT gave the correct answer.
Finally, ChatGPT and Claude were asked to translate a Japanese passage into English. The standard translation is:
Flowers bloom in spring, but sometimes they bloom in summer. The grass beyond the meadow is green. The atmosphere is rich in the aroma of bark.
ChatGPT’s translation is:
Flowers bloom in spring, but they can also bloom in summer. The grass beyond the pasture is green. There is a rich scent of tree bark in the atmosphere.
Claude’s translation is:
Flowers bloom in spring, but they also bloom in summer. The grass beyond the meadow is green. The aroma of the tree bark makes for a rich atmosphere.
Compared to the standard translation, Claude translates from Japanese to English a little better.